Scoping Variables

Last updated

To allow you to define different values for variables depending on where you are deploying, variables can be scoped.

Variables can be scoped by:

  • Environments (most common)
  • Specific machines
  • Specific machine roles
  • Specific deployment steps

For example, suppose these variables exist:

Name Value Environment scope
LogLevel Info
LogLevel Warn Production, Staging
DBConnectionString Server=SQL-UAT1;Database=... UAT
DBConnectionString Server=SQL-PROD;Database=... Production

During deployment, Octopus will try to select the most specifically scoped variable that applies. For example, when deploying to Production, the LogLevel property would be Warn. But to any other environment, it would fall back to the less-specific variable and have a value of Info instead.

Assigning Scopes

You can set the scope of a variable by selecting the Scope cell, and choosing the scope values:

Scope Specificity

Imagine you have one variable scoped to an environment (Production), and another scoped to a machine within the environment. Which value should Octopus choose?

Since variables can be scoped in many different ways, there needs to be a predictable, deterministic order in which they are resolved. The list below is the priority in which variable scopes take precedence - the top items are considered higher priority than the bottom ones:

  • The current step/action (most specific)
  • The current machine
  • Roles applied to the current machine and targeted by the current step
  • Roles applied to the current machine
  • The target tenant (if tenant-features are enabled)
  • The target tenant-tag (if tenant-features are enabled)
  • The target environment
  • The target channel (if channels are enabled)
  • No scope (least specific)

For example, imagine a LogLevel variable with a value scoped to an environment is considered by Octopus to be "less specific" than a value scoped to a machine role. So when two possible values for a variable exist, Octopus will choose the "more specific" scope value over the less specific one.

Variable scoping also works like CSS rules; a value scoped twice is more specific than a value scoped once. For example, a variable scoped to an environment and a role is more specific than a variable scoped to just a role.

If two variables are scoped equally, Octopus will choose project-defined variables ahead of library-defined ones. If this still does not resolve the conflict the result is non-deterministic and you should not depend on a specific value being used. Instead, you should take care when scoping variables so that they are unlikely to conflict.

Scope specificity can quickly become very complicated. Read our blog post for a better understanding of why scope specificity works the way it does.