What is CI/CD security?
CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery/Continuous Deployment) security refers to the practice of integrating security measures throughout the CI/CD pipeline to protect the software development lifecycle from potential threats and vulnerabilities.
This involves implementing security controls at every stage of the pipeline, from source code management to deployment, to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the software and its underlying infrastructure.
Securing CI/CD is distinct from traditional application security because threats can arise from the codebase as well as from third-party dependencies, pipeline configurations, and integrations. Issues often stem from privileged pipeline components, exposed secrets, or compromised build agents.
Here are a few reasons CI/CD security is important:
- Reduced risk: Integrating security into the CI/CD pipeline helps identify and mitigate vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle, reducing the risk of security breaches and data leaks.
- Faster time to market: By automating security checks and testing, CI/CD security helps accelerate the software delivery process without compromising security.
- Improved compliance: Secure CI/CD pipelines can help organizations meet regulatory compliance requirements by ensuring that security practices are followed throughout the software development lifecycle.
- Cost savings: Addressing security issues early in the pipeline is more cost-effective than fixing them after deployment.
- Reputation management: Securing the CI/CD pipeline helps protect against potential attacks that could compromise the integrity, confidentiality, or availability of the software, protecting the organization’s reputation.
Key security risks in CI/CD pipelines
1. Insufficient control over pipeline flow
CI/CD pipelines often involve multiple automated stages and handoffs across code, artifacts, infrastructure, and environments. When access and triggers for these stages are not tightly controlled, unauthorized users or compromised components can inject malicious steps, modify workflows, or trigger deployments at will. Lack of flow control can also result in accidental overwrites, early deployments to production, or unintended privilege escalation.
To address these risks, organizations must enforce strict policies on who can change pipeline configurations, which repositories or artifacts are used, and what automated processes can run. Segregation of duties, multi-factor authentication, and automated logging for audit trails are essential. Monitoring for unexpected sequence changes or anomalous actions helps detect abuses of the flow, ensuring only approved code flows through controlled paths to production.
2. Exposed secrets
Credentials, API tokens, and private keys are fundamental to the operation of CI/CD pipelines, but when stored insecurely—such as in configuration files, version control, or environment variables—they become easy targets for attackers. One exposed secret can enable lateral movement, data theft, or infrastructure manipulation. Automated scanning tools are increasingly capable of identifying exposed secrets in code repositories, but attackers are just as quick to spot and exploit these weaknesses.
Preventing the risk of exposed secrets requires dedicated secrets management solutions that integrate with the CI/CD system. Tools such as HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager provide secure storage and fine-grained access control for sensitive credentials. Automating secret rotation and enforcing that secrets are never committed to version control are best practices to ensure there are no accidental leaks during pipeline execution.
3. Insecure dependencies
Modern software heavily relies on third-party libraries and open-source components. If these dependencies are not thoroughly vetted or are pulled from untrusted sources, they can introduce vulnerabilities directly into the codebase. Supply chain attacks, where malicious actors poison popular packages or update trusted libraries with malicious payloads, have become more frequent. Failure to check dependencies in CI/CD pipelines means vulnerable or compromised code can slip unnoticed into production.
Mitigating this risk requires automated dependency scanning within the CI/CD process using tools that identify known vulnerabilities and check the integrity and provenance of each package. Developers should set strict policies around allowable sources for dependencies, enforce version pinning to avoid unvetted updates, and regularly monitor advisories for vulnerable libraries.
4. Malicious code injection
CI/CD pipelines may be targets for adversaries intending to modify source code or build artifacts by injecting malicious segments. This can occur through compromised credentials, unprotected integrations, or manipulation of build scripts and containers. Malicious code injection threatens both internal systems and end users if undetected before release.
Comprehensive code review practices, automated static code analysis, and signed builds minimize the risk. Pipeline permissions should be restricted, with sensitive build scripts or containers isolated and monitored for unauthorized changes. Ensuring that each stage validates and attests the artifacts prevents silent modification, thereby reducing the opportunity for attackers to introduce and propagate harmful changes throughout the deployment cycle.
Tony Kelly is a DevOps marketing leader who drives innovation and awareness of the latest trends in Continuous Delivery.
Key methods for securing the CI/CD pipeline
1. Software composition analysis
Software composition analysis (SCA) involves identifying and cataloging all open-source and third-party components within a codebase to detect potential vulnerabilities, license risks, and outdated packages. Integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, this method automates checks for known security issues by cross-referencing component inventories with vulnerability databases. This allows teams to remediate issues quickly, before deployment, by updating to secure versions or removing problematic dependencies altogether.
An effective software composition analysis solution also enables enforcement of organizational policies regarding acceptable licenses or risk scores for dependencies. Automated tools can block builds containing unsafe packages or raise alerts when risky components are introduced. By maintaining an up-to-date software bill of materials (SBOM), organizations gain visibility and control, aiding in both incident response and compliance reporting.
2. Source code scanning
Source code scanning is the automated detection of security flaws, bugs, and unsafe programming practices in application source code. Integrated early in the CI/CD process, these scanners use static analysis techniques to flag patterns linked with injection vulnerabilities, insecure APIs, or improper error handling. By running at every commit or pull request, issues are identified and resolved before merging, reducing security debt and production risk.
Regular source code scanning also helps enforce secure coding standards across teams. Results are fed directly to developers, providing immediate feedback and supporting remediation before vulnerabilities become embedded deep in the codebase. When paired with code review and manual inspections, source code scanning is crucial for building a secure development culture.
3. Security testing
Security testing encompasses a range of techniques—from dynamic application security testing (DAST) to interactive application security testing (IAST) and fuzzing—to identify vulnerabilities in running applications within the CI/CD pipeline. Unlike source code scanning, these methods test the actual runtime behavior of applications, uncovering issues like authentication errors, logic flaws, or configuration mistakes that only appear in execution.
Automating security testing during build and deploy phases ensures that the code not only compiles safely but also operates securely under real-world conditions. Integrating these tools into the CI/CD pipeline enables immediate detection of problems, with failed tests pausing or blocking deployments. This continual evaluation creates a feedback loop, driving steady improvement in software resilience and lowering exposure to attack.
4. Runtime security
Runtime security monitors systems in production and pre-production for threats such as process anomalies, policy violations, and suspicious behaviors. This includes detecting unexpected changes to containers, unauthorized process execution, or atypical network requests. Integrating runtime security tools with CI/CD means that even after all pre-deployment checks, the system remains protected from emerging or previously unknown threats.
Real-time alerts and automated responses ensure that corrective actions—like isolating containers or revoking compromised credentials—are executed promptly. By tightly coupling runtime monitoring with the CI/CD workflow, organizations bolster their incident response and forensics capabilities, maintaining control even in highly dynamic and automated environments.
Challenges in CI/CD security
Balancing speed and security
Organizations adopt CI/CD to accelerate delivery, but integrating security controls can be seen as an impediment to rapid release cycles. Developers often worry that additional scans, tests, or manual interventions will slow pipeline throughput or create bottlenecks. This tension between speed and security is a persistent challenge.
To address this, security controls must be automated and seamlessly integrated into pipelines. Lightweight, incremental checks at each stage minimize friction while providing comprehensive coverage. Educating teams about the consequences of security lapses helps align priorities, demonstrating that robust security is compatible with—and critical to—sustained delivery speed.
Resource constraints
Implementing robust CI/CD security often requires substantial investment in tools, training, and personnel, which may be infeasible for organizations with limited budgets or staffing. Security expertise can be scarce, and operational teams might lack the capacity to manage and interpret continuous streams of scan results, alerts, and remediation tasks.
To mitigate these constraints, organizations should prioritize high-impact controls and use managed services or open-source solutions where possible. Automation can reduce manual effort, and integrating security into development culture empowers everyone to participate. Focusing resources on at-risk pipeline segments delivers meaningful improvements without overwhelming teams.
Tool integration
The effectiveness of CI/CD security depends on smoothly integrating various tools into complex, heterogeneous development environments. CI/CD pipelines span diverse stages, programming languages, and deployment scenarios, each potentially requiring different scanning, monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms. Integration challenges can lead to fragmented visibility, redundant steps, or missed vulnerabilities.
To streamline integration, prioritize tools with open APIs, plug-ins, and strong vendor support for leading CI/CD platforms. Standardizing pipeline architecture and consolidating toolsets where feasible reduces complexity and ensures consistent enforcement and monitoring. Regularly reviewing the toolchain, deprecating ineffective tools, and adapting to new requirements maintains a coherent and reliable security posture.
Best practices for CI/CD security
Organizations should consider the following practices to ensure the security of their CI/CD pipelines.
1. Enforce infrastructure as code
Enforcing infrastructure as code (IaC) ensures that infrastructure provisioning—servers, containers, networks—is automated, repeatable, and version-controlled alongside application code. Treating infrastructure definitions as code makes it possible to scan for security misconfigurations, enforce policy, and ensure consistency across environments. This reduces drift, limits ad hoc changes, and enables reproducible deployments that are easier to audit and manage.
IaC frameworks also allow teams to embed security guardrails, such as least-privilege permissions, automatic patching, or network segmentation, directly into provisioning scripts. Versioning infrastructure changes enables rollback and forensics in case of incident, while peer review for IaC code maintains accountability.
2. Implement shift-left testing
Shift-left testing moves security and quality checks earlier in the development lifecycle, enabling issues to be detected and addressed before they progress to later, more expensive stages. This involves embedding automated security scans and tests into code commit, merge, and build phases, giving quick feedback to developers. Catching vulnerabilities early reduces remediation cost and security risk.
Shift-left also empowers developers with tools and practices for writing secure code, fostering collaboration with security teams rather than treating security as a final gatekeeper. Regular education, automated tooling, and close integration of security into CI/CD workflows cultivate a culture of shared responsibility.
3. Effective secrets management
Effective secrets management prevents unauthorized access to credentials, API keys, certificates, and tokens in the CI/CD pipeline. Rather than embedding secrets in code or pipeline configurations, organizations should use dedicated secrets management solutions that securely store, retrieve, and inject secrets during pipeline execution. These solutions tightly control access and provide audit trails for all operations involving sensitive data.
Automation is key to secrets management at scale. Integrating secret rotation, revocation, and automatic expiration minimizes window of exposure. Coupled with strong authentication, access by least privilege, and monitoring, secrets management enforces critical safeguards without disrupting pipeline automation or developer workflows.
4. Automate vulnerability scanning
Automating vulnerability scanning ensures that code, artifacts, dependencies, and infrastructure are continually evaluated for both known and emerging threats. By embedding scanners into different CI/CD stages—source, build, deploy—organizations can block non-compliant or risky deployments and provide actionable findings directly to developers. Automated scanning reduces manual effort and ensures consistent, repeatable testing across releases.
Additionally, automated scanning supports regulatory and governance requirements by maintaining records of security status and remediation activities. Consolidating scanning results in a central dashboard enables quick triage and prioritization. By treating vulnerability management as a continuous process rather than a periodic event, organizations maintain a strong security posture as their tech stack evolves.
5. Adopt zero trust in CI/CD pipelines
Adopting a zero trust approach means that no pipeline component, user, or process is inherently trusted—access, privileges, and actions must be continuously validated. In CI/CD, this translates to strict identity verification, network segmentation, and minimizing implicit trust relationships among build agents, repositories, and external tools. Every access request is authenticated and authorized, limiting blast radius if compromise occurs.
Zero trust also emphasizes constant monitoring for anomalous behavior and rapid incident response. Integrating zero trust principles with CI/CD tools ensures continuous attestation and verification, reducing the risk of supply chain attacks, privilege escalation, or insider threats. This layered defense fosters resilience, helping organizations respond swiftly to evolving threats across the pipeline.
Secure deployment automation with Octopus
Octopus Deploy embeds security and compliance directly into deployment automation through built-in audit trails that capture every process change and environment progression, granular role-based access control, and deployment lifecycles that enforce required SDLC stages. Configuration as Code stores deployment processes in version control for review and rollback, while integrations with ITSM and SIEM tools, such as Splunk and Datadog, enable sign-off workflows and centralized log streaming.
The platform’s secrets management securely stores and scopes variables, such as API keys and passwords, ensuring that credentials are only accessible where needed. All communication between the Octopus Server and Tentacle agents runs through fully encrypted channels, while deployment target management reduces the need for direct server access among developers.
With over 500 step templates for standardized processes, quick rollback capabilities that keep the two most recent releases available, and DORA metrics tracking through DevOps Insights, Octopus provides financial institutions with the visibility and control needed to deploy frequently without compromising security or compliance requirements.
Help us continuously improve
Please let us know if you have any feedback about this page.